Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 850 SW2D 508 - Chappell v. State

Chappell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2008
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lankston v. State · Cooks v. State · Davis v. State · Ferguson v. State · Stark v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial judge, on the demand of the defendant or his attorney, or of the State’s counsel, shall cause a sufficient number of jurors from which a jury may be selected to try the case to be randomly selected from the members of the general panel drawn or assigned as jurors in the case. The clerk shall randomly select the jurors by a computer or other process of random selection and shall write or print the names, in the order selected, on the jury list from which the jury is to be selected to try the case. The clerk shall deliver a copy of the list to the State’s counsel and to the defendant or his attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[t]he right of trial by jury stands on a higher plane than expediency [and a] shuffle of the jury panel for the case actually takes a minimal amount of time if properly handled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.