National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. US Department of Energy Arkansas Power & Light Company’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2018
9 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Heckler v. Chaney · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha · Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency · Batterton v. Marshall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Each year since 1983, the Secretary has published an annual 'Fee Adequacy Report' concluding, not unlike Goldilocks, that the statutory fee is not too high, and not too low, but just right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“). In NARUC, the court explained that when Congress passed NWPA it did not decide whether high-level radioactive waste resulting from atomic energy defense activities should be stored in repositories developed under the Act or separately. Once the President determined that defense wastes should be disposed in the repositories being developed for civilian waste under NWPA, DOE was obliged under NWPA to arrange for use of the civilian repository for disposal of defense high-level waste. 42 U.S.C. S 10107(b)(2). Section 10107(b)(2) provides that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“published in the Federal Register in which the Department of Energy tentatively established a method for allocating the costs of developing, constructing, and operating nuclear waste repositories between the government and commercial producers of such waste. First, the court held that the methodology had yet to be applied to anybody, leaving the court to conclude that its”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.