Colorado Nurses Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority’s Empirical Analysis
851 F.2d 1486 · 1988
Citation profile
26 federal appellate · 5 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. United States (1989), Liberty Maritime Corporation v. United States Omi Corporation (1991)
26 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 4101 · 38 U.S.C. § 4107 · 38 U.S.C. § 4108 · 38 U.S.C. § 4109 · 38 U.S.C. § 4110 · 38 U.S.C. § 4113 · 5 U.S.C. § 7101 · 5 U.S.C. § 7102
Relies on Pierce v. Underwood · Morton v. Mancari · Radzanower v. Touche Ross & Co. · Simpson v. United States · International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 474 v. National Labor Relations Board
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]otwithstanding any law, Executive order, or regulation.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Except as otherwise specifically provided in this title, the authority of the Secretary to prescribe regulations under section 7421 of this title is subject to the right of Federal employees to engage in collective bargaining with respect to conditions of employment through representatives chosen by them in accordance with chapter 71 of title 5 (relating to labor-management relations).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he purpose of this language is clear: when the [Secretary] prescribes regulations concerning conditions of employment, he is to be unhampered by the range of federal personnel statutes and regulations that might otherwise constrain his authority.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.