People v. B Cepeda’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · North Carolina v. Pearce · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Rose v. Clark
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As we are unable to conclude that this evidence [on an invalid count] did not influence the jury's verdict on the other counts of the indictment, we will order a new trial on all counts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A] trial court has wide discretion in determining whether a witness is qualified to testify as an expert.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.