Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 851 F.2d 1564 - People v. B Cepeda

People v. B Cepeda’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · North Carolina v. Pearce · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Rose v. Clark

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As we are unable to conclude that this evidence [on an invalid count] did not influence the jury's verdict on the other counts of the indictment, we will order a new trial on all counts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] trial court has wide discretion in determining whether a witness is qualified to testify as an expert.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “unless it is more probable than not that the error did not materially affect the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.