Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 851 F.2d 412 - Siegel v. Lyng

Siegel v. Lyng’s Empirical Analysis

851 F.2d 412 · 1988

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
May 2018
most recently cited

12 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2018

12 federal appellate ·

1501988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 1047 · 21 U.S.C. § 467 · 21 U.S.C. § 671 · 7 U.S.C. § 499A (Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 499B · 7 U.S.C. § 499C · 7 U.S.C. § 499E · 7 U.S.C. § 499F

Relies on Nixon v. Administrator of General Services · United States v. Brown · De Veau v. Braisted · Mobile Jackson Kansas City Railroad Company v. J a Turnipseed · Selective Service System v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “under the bill of attainder clause, see id. at 417, because there were legitimate justifications for the employment bar:This Court recently echoed Congress' express purpose behind the PACA enforcement regime, including the employment restrictions: namely, that the Act's”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The line of Supreme Court law on the Bill of Attainder Clause indicates that legislation will survive Bill of Attainder attack if the statute furthers nonpunitive legislative purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “any affiliation ... with the business operations of a licensee, with or without compensation, including ownership or self employment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.