Johnson v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
851 F.2d 748 · 1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2006
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Fraga v. Bowen · Barajas v. Heckler · Perez v. Heckler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there was substantial evidence in the record to support a conclusion that [the claimant] could perform sedentary work”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Diaz v. Chater
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.