In re Chudik’s Empirical Analysis
851 F.3d 1365 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Topliff v. Topliff · In re Schreiber · Net Moneyin, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc. · Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hough our review of an anticipation finding is deferential, we have not hesitated to reverse the Board when substantial evidence does not support its findings”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Hodges
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.