Chai v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis
851 F.3d 190 · 2017
Citation profile
9 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1231 · 26 U.S.C. § 1401 · 26 U.S.C. § 1402 · 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 26 U.S.C. § 183 · 26 U.S.C. § 475 · 26 U.S.C. § 61 (Payment-in-Kind Tax Treatment Act of 1983) · 26 U.S.C. § 6201
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Singleton v. Wulff · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · Catlin v. United States · Hormel v. Helvering
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no later than the date the IRS issues the notice of deficiency (or files an answer or amended answer) asserting such penalty.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“initial determination of such assessment”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Partners v. Comm'r · Roth v. C.I.R.“[p]artnership tax [wa]s subject to the procedures set forth in the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 ('TEFRA'), Pub. L. No. 97-248, 96 Stat. 324 (codified as amended at I.R.C. §§ 6221 - 6234 ).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.