Phillips v. White’s Empirical Analysis
851 F.3d 567 · 2017
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · United States v. Cronic · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Bell Warden v. Cone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“For Cronic prejudice to apply, petitioner must be deprived of counsel during a critical stage of trial, such as sentencing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Z.M.“AEDPA's deferential standard is inapplicable to [the petitioner]'s claim because no state court ever decided it”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. Bauman“performance amounted to nonperformance; he essentially ceded the sentencing to the Commonwealth”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Com. of Pa. v. Diaz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.