Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 851 F.3d 710 - Morfin v. Tillerson

Morfin v. Tillerson’s Empirical Analysis

851 F.3d 710 · 2017

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
January 2024
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 702 · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Marks v. United States · Kleindienst v. Mandel · United States Knauff v. Shaughnessy · 135 S. Ct. 2128 - Kerry v. Din · 134 S. Ct. 1090 - Kaley v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ Din ] left things as Mandel had left them-and the opinion in Mandel spoke for a majority of the Court, sparing us the need to determine how to identify the controlling view in Din given that the concurring opinion is not a logical subset of the lead opinion (or the reverse). Mandel tells us not to go behind a facially legitimate and bona fide explanation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the denial of a visa application is not a question open to review by the judiciary”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]bsent an affirmative showing of bad faith on the part of the consular officer ... which Din has not plausibly alleged with sufficient particularity- Mandel instructs us not to 'look behind' the Government's exclusion of [Din's husband] for additional factual details beyond what its express reliance on § 1182(a)(3)(B) encompassed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.