851 So. 2d 330 - State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Van Winkle · 572 So. 2d 117 - State v. Revere · 670 So. 2d 1255 - State v. Washington · State v. Short · 559 So. 2d 541 - State v. White
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[D]efense should be allowed substantial freedom in cross-examining state witnesses. But the trial court may curtail such freedom when the questions asked are irrelevant or immaterial to the case. Questions are of material issue if they are of importance to the case. Questions are relevant if they tend to prove or negate the commission of the offense and the intent. Such rulings will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a showing of manifest abuse of discretion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Anders · State v. Magee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.