¶1Scott Earle challenges an order that denied his rule 3.850 motion for postcon-viction relief. We reverse and remand for the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing to address Earle’s sentences in light of State v. Klayman, 835 So.2d 248 (Fla.2002); State v. Travis, 808 So.2d 194 (Fla.2002); Hayes v. State, 750 So.2d 1 (Fla.1999); see also DeFreis v. State, 814 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). We find no error with the trial court’s disposition of Earle’s other claims.
851 So. 2d 742
Earle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 11, 2003
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-06-11
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2019
22 state decisions
Relies on 750 So. 2d 1 - Hayes v. State · 835 So. 2d 248 - State v. Klayman · 808 So. 2d 194 - State v. Travis
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2003-06-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →