Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 851 SW2D 341 - Norton v. State

Norton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2008
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Doerr v. Doerr · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Latimer v. Stainer · Clampitt v. Interinsurance Exchange · Johnson v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was so inflammatory that the court's instruction to the jury to disregard did not cure the error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “There were only two people out there and we heard from one of them,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.