Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 851 SW2D 359 - Blount v. State

Blount v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2000
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 232nd Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Aguirre v. State · Ward v. State · Jones v. State · Walker v. State · Cook v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is no indication that the Legislature intended multiple punishments under the aggravated robbery statute for conduct involving more than one victim where there is only one theft. The aggravated robbery statute hinges on the fact that there has been a theft, an essential element required to violate the aggravated robbery statute. Where there is only one theft from one individual, there can be only one aggravated robbery offense. Because there was only one theft in this ease, there can be only one conviction for aggravated robbery, regardless of the number of victims of assaultive conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.