Hadnot v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently February 2020
2 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Galloway v. State · Almand v. State · Sparks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prior conviction that was alleged for enhancement may be collaterally attacked if it is void (as it would be if it were based on a fundamentally defective indictment) (footnote omitted) or if it is tainted by a constitutional defect (as it would be if an indigent defendant had been denied counsel in a felony trial), (footnote omitted) Other, lesser infirmities in a prior conviction may not be raised by a collateral attack. Such infirmities include insufficiency of evidence (footnote omitted) and irregularities in the judgment or sentence, (footnote omitted) It does not matter that such infirmities might have resulted in a reversal had they been presented by an appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ray v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.