Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 F.2d 1 - United States v. Murphy

United States v. Murphy’s Empirical Analysis

852 F.2d 1 · 1988

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

49 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably United States v. Saccoccia (1995), United States v. Rodriguez (1988)

49 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions

3401988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 22 U.S.C. § 1934 · 22 U.S.C. § 2778

Relies on Mathews v. United States · Lustig v. United States · Canron, Inc. v. Plasser American Corp. · United States v. Petrozziello · United States v. Beck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[N]o defense articles or defense services designated by the President under [the United States Munitions List] may be exported or imported without a license”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'When the case gets to court, all that the Government needs to prove is that the item exported appears on the munitions list ... (and of course that the defendant knowingly and willfully exported it, with the necessary intent and knowledge, and without the appropriate license).'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'defendant must know that his conduct in exporting from the United States articles proscribed by the statute is violative of the law'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.