United States v. Keane’s Empirical Analysis
852 F.2d 199 · 1988
Citation profile
92 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 145 later decisions — most recently December 2021 · most notably United States v. Walgren (1989), United States v. Mandel (1988)
92 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Paul v. Davis · Allen v. Wright · Sibron v. State of New York Peters · Brown v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 145 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t may well be that none of this cost the City or anyone else one red cent.... But the mail fraud statute proscribes fraudulent schemes; it does not confine penalties to those whose schemes succeed in raking off cash, a point no less valid today than when emphasized on direct appeal [thirteen years ago].”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“that the error is the type of defect that would have justified relief during the terms of imprisonment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] strong emotional interest is not enough to produce an Article III case or controversy.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.