Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

852 F.2d 567

Docket No. 88-7636.

Williams v. Clark

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: June 30, 1988. Decided: July 22, 1988.

This page is marked noindex.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-07-22

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Patrick J. Witcher v. James E. Johnson William P. Rogers

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1988-07-22

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Haywood Williams, Jr., appellant pro se.

Norma Smithwick Harrell (Office of the Attorney General for North Carolina), William F. Fairley (Fairley, Jess & Isenberg), Addison Hewlett, Jr. (Hewlett & Collins), Robert Glen Peterson (Prevatte, Prevatte & Peterson), for appellees.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, K.K. HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Haywood Williams, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. Clark, CA-86-667-CRT (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/852/f2d/567 · .json · Public domain