Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 F.2d 975 - United States v. Long

United States v. Long’s Empirical Analysis

852 F.2d 975 · 1988

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
8
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably United States v. Jordan (1989), United States v. Bouthot (1989)

27 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

34019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Brady v. United States · Miller v. Fenton · Culombe v. Connecticut · Bram v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] review of the totality of the circumstances under which the statement was given is still required and any inducement offered to the defendant is but one fact, albeit an important one, in that analysis.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The state and federal systems are separate and distinct, and the defendant need only be informed of the direct consequences he may face within the particular system.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[H]indsight realization that a deal was not as good as originally hoped for is not sufficient reason to suppress such evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.