Dukes v. Deaton’s Empirical Analysis
852 F.3d 1035 · 2017
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Duncan v. Walker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“weigh the quantum of force employed against the severity of the crime at issue; whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others; and whether the suspect actively resisted arrest or attempted to evade arrest by flight.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a plaintiff may not amend her complaint through argument in a brief opposing summary judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the contours of a right are sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. King v. King
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.