Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 F.3d 1035 - Dukes v. Deaton

Dukes v. Deaton’s Empirical Analysis

852 F.3d 1035 · 2017

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Graham v. Connor · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “weigh the quantum of force employed against the severity of the crime at issue; whether the suspect poses an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or others; and whether the suspect actively resisted arrest or attempted to evade arrest by flight.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a plaintiff may not amend her complaint through argument in a brief opposing summary judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the contours of a right are sufficiently clear that every reasonable official would have understood that what he is doing violates that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.