Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 F.3d 1298 - Stephens v. Degiovanni

Stephens v. Degiovanni’s Empirical Analysis

852 F.3d 1298 · 2017

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
May 2025
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2025

8 federal appellate ·

13020172020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Graham v. Connor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he nature and extent of physical injuries sustained by a plaintiff”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]e have repeatedly ruled that a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment, and is denied qualified immunity, if he or she uses gratuitous and excessive force against a suspect who is under control, not resisting, and obeying commands.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Because this standard establishes no bright line, qualified immunity applies unless application of the standard would inevitably lead every reasonable officer in [the officer's] position to conclude the force was unlawful.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.