Arej v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
852 F.3d 665 · 2017
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Iglesias v. Mukasey · Cruz-Mayaho v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e lack jurisdiction to review how the [Board] evaluated and weighed [the petitioner's] evidence or to test its decision for abuse of discretion; we may review its decision only for errors of law and constitutional infirmities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Fuller v. Whitaker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.