Bentley v. Dennison’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “administratively impose” and insist that the practice was governed by state law, which mandated terms of PRS. Neither of these arguments has merit. Defendants do not dispute the material fact that DOCS continued to impose terms of PRS where the commitment papers were silent. . See Annucci Decl. ¶ 13. . Defendants’ Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment or to Modify the Class Certified in this Action (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 144 F. Supp. 3d 441 - Betances v. Fischer

2. “Judicial notice of public records is appropriate-and does not convert a motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment-because the facts noticed are not subject to reasonable dispute and are capable of being verified by sources whose accuracy cannot be reasonably questioned.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Novio v. N.Y. Acad. of Art