Spoor v. Serota’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2024
1 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 51 Cal. 3d 120 - Moore v. Regents of University of California · Destefano v. Grabrian · 39 Colo. App. 360 - Russell v. First Am. Mtg. Co. · Kitto v. Gilbert · 95 Wash. 2d 306 - Keogan v. Holy Family Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is a rule of evidence which defines the circumstances under which a presumption of negligence will arise as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“because the same issue was before the jury in the context of plaintiffs' negligence claims.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.