People v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
1 district · 19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2025
1 district · 19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Abbott · People v. Milton · People v. Mingo · People v. Noble · People v. Hickam
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the victim's credibility. Again, we disagree. Relevant evidence may be excluded under CRE 403 if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice. In reviewing the trial court's decision to admit the testimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Williams“did not pose any barrier to the jury giving full consideration to the defendant's theory of defense”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Ujaama
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.