State v. Workman’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
76 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably State v. Holgate (2000), State v. Diaz (1993)
76 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Tot v. United States · State v. Petree · Dinneen v. Finch · Siruta v. Hesston Corp. · State v. McCardell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may not reassess credibility or reweigh the evidence, but must resolve conflicts in the evidence in favor of the jury verdict.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lucero · State v. Cegers“a trial court may arrest a jury verdict when the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, is so inconclusive or so inherently improbable as to an element of the crime that reasonable minds must have entertained a reasonable doubt as to that element.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harris · State v. Miller“When the evidence presented is conflicting or disputed, the jury serves as the exclusive judge of both the credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given particular evidence.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Martin · State v. Martin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.