Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 SO2D 1263 - Frazier v. Dollar General

Frazier v. Dollar General’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Banks v. Indus. Roofing & Sheet Metal · Pinkins v. Cardinal Wholesale Supply, Inc. · 773 So. 2d 694 - McCarroll v. Airport Shuttle, Inc. · 665 So. 2d 657 - Knotts v. Snelling Temporaries · 729 So. 2d 109 - Ward v. Phoenix Operating Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A. It shall be unlawful for any person, for the purpose of obtaining or defeating any benefit or payment under the provisions of this Chapter, either for himself or for any other person, to willfully make a false statement or representation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “E. Any employee violating this Section shall, upon determination by workers' compensation judge, forfeit any right to compensation benefits under this Chapter.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.