Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

852 So. 2d 289

Bowman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-07-03

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2014

8 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-07-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The Appellant, Kelvin Bowman, appeals the summary denial of his belated Rule 3.850 post-conviction motion. Bowman’s motion is not only untimely, as it was filed well beyond two years after the judgment and sentence in his case became final, but is also successive, as he raises claims of trial court error and ineffective assistance of counsel which could have been raised in a prior 3.850 motion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b) and (f). Accordingly, his motion for post-conviction relief was properly denied.

¶2AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, C.J, MONACO and TORPY, JJ., concur.
/852/so2d/289 · .json · Public domain