Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

852 So. 2d 398

Bufford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 20, 2003

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-08-20

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 2016

11 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the order denying defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence as to the conviction for count two. However, on remand, the sentence for count two shall be corrected to reflect the trial court’s oral prison releasee reoffender adjudication on this count. As to count three, based on the state’s proper concession, we vacate the prison releasee reoffender adjudication on this count, as that conviction is not for an enumerated offense.

/852/so2d/398 · .json · Public domain