852 So. 2d 43 - McClendon v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
17
cited by 17 later decisions
2
states following
August 2013
most recently cited
17 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 802 So. 2d 77 - Baker v. State · Sudduth v. State · 566 So. 2d 1201 - Murphy v. State · Gangl v. State · 751 So. 2d 1038 - Richmond v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where substantial evidence of such quality and weight exists to support the verdict and where reasonable and fair minded jurors may have found appellant guilty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“to reverse and render where the facts point overwhelmingly in favor of the appellant that reasonable men could not have found appellant guilty.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“When reviewing a trial court's denial of a motion for a new trial, this Court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to upholding the verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.