Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California · 503 So. 2d 321 - State v. Causey · Miles v. Burgess · 831 So. 2d 93 - Westerheide v. State · 802 So. 2d 1113 - Pullen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ARE THE ANDERS PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO CRIMINAL CASES TO BE FOLLOWED IN CASES INVOLVING APPEALS FROM JIMMY RYCE ACT COMMITMENT ORDERS?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State“a person committed under this procedure could be held in a secure facility for the remainder of that person's life.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.