Bounds v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · 645 So. 2d 829 - Chase v. State · Conner v. State · 533 So. 2d 473 - Lanier v. State · 719 So. 2d 180 - Dudley v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Appellate review of determinations of whether to admit hearsay is limited to whether an error of law occurred, and if it did not, then appellate review is limited to the abuse of discretion standard ... Mere errors in evidentiary rulings by the trial court, unless accompanied by some adverse effect on ‘a substantial right’ of the defendant, do not require reversal on appeal ... It is the duty of the appellant, not only to demonstrate error in the introduction of the evidence, but also to show the prejudice to the defense that arose from that erroneous ruling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Shelton v. King
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.