Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 So. 2d 675 - Daughtry v. Kuiper

852 So. 2d 675 - Daughtry v. Kuiper’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 2006
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Herrington v. Spell · West v. SANDERS CLINIC FOR WOMEN, PA · 461 So. 2d 765 - Kilpatrick v. Mississippi Baptist Medical · Brandon HMA, Inc. v. Bradshaw · 684 So. 2d 574 - Dixie Ins. Co. v. Mooneyhan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he admission of expert testimony is controlled by the trial judge's discretion. This Court will not disturb the trial judge's decision unless there was a clear abuse of that discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.