Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 SW2D 181 - State v. Crenshaw

State v. Crenshaw’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Hill v. Lockhart · Estelle v. McGuire · Hernandez v. New York · Cage v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “However, that case is inapposite in that the claim of error there was preserved by timely objection at trial. Furthermore, Solivan is not binding on us. Futrell v. State, 667 S.W.2d 404, 407 [3] (Mo. banc 1984). We are constitutionally bound to follow the last controlling decision of the Supreme Court of Missouri.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “give both sides a fair trial, [such that] the venire could infer she did not assume [Defendant] was guilty and would base her decision on the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.