Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 SW2D 3 - Ex Parte May

Ex Parte May’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Oregon v. Kennedy · MacArthur Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp. · Reading Co. v. Schweitzer · Johnson v. Texas · Hoag v. State of New Jersey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We look to the record to see if the record leaves us with the definite and firm conviction that the trial court made a mistake, [citation omitted] The clearly erroneous standard accords great deference to the trial court’s findings and conclusions. This is so because the trial court bases its rulings in part upon a credibility determination that is not reviewable by the appellate court, [citation omitted] We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling, [citation omitted].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.