Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 852 SW2D 730 - Ex Parte McDonald

Ex Parte McDonald’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2016

17 state decisions

80199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 290th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Stack v. Boyle · Ex Parte Vasquez · Ex Parte Charlesworth · Ex Parte Ivey · Ex Parte Wilson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The bail shall be sufficiently high to give reasonable assurance that the undertaking will be complied with. (2) The power to require bail is not to be so used as to make it an instrument of oppression. (3) The nature of the offense and the circumstances under which it was committed are to be considered. (4) The ability to make bail is to be regarded, and proof may be taken upon this point. (5) The future safety of a victim of the alleged offense and the community shall be considered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Conclusion As we have stated previously in such cases, we are ever mindful that the offense charged is a very serious matter carrying with it a correspondingly harsh penalty. Counterbalancing this concern are the rights guaranteed defendant under the Texas Constitution, our responsibilities under the Texas Constitution, and our obligation to uphold the Texas Constitution and adhere to its principles.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.