853 A.2d 521
270 Conn. 902
STATE of Connecticut v. David ROSARIO.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Decided June 16, 2004.
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 2014
23 state decisions
Relies on Grimm v. Grimm · 82 Conn. App. 691 - State v. Rosario
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2004-06-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Richard E. Condon, Jr., assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
¶2Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
¶3The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 82 Conn.App. 691, 846 A.2d 926 (2004), is denied.