United States v. Lance’s Empirical Analysis
853 F.2d 1177 · 1988
Citation profile
78 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 116 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably United States v. Briscoe (1990), State v. Hinton (1993)
78 federal appellate · 1 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · Batson v. Kentucky · Pelaes v. United States · Bell v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 116 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[T]he vagarious process of choosing jurors need not be controlled by a simple equation; it may be influenced by intuitive assumptions that are not fatally suspect merely because they are not quantifiable, see [United States v.] Forbes , 816 F.2d [1006] at 1010-11 [(5th Cir. 1987)], and by the interplay of various factors, see United States v. Lewis , 837 F.2d 415 , 417 n. 5 (9th Cir. 1988)' [ cert. denied , 488 U.S. 923 , 109 S.Ct. 304 , 102 L.Ed.2d 323 (1988)].”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`young, single, and without children or a `substantial stake in the community' and that each appeared inattentive....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vargas v. State · Whitsey v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.