Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 853 F.2d 25 - Ojeda-Toro v. Rivera-Mendez

Ojeda-Toro v. Rivera-Mendez’s Empirical Analysis

853 F.2d 25 · 1988

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
2
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently October 2016 · most notably Teamsters Chauffeurs Warehousemen and Helpers Union Local No v. Superline Transportation Company Inc (1992), Hoult v. Hoult (1995)

24 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions

2301988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Ackermann v. United States · Klapprott v. United States · Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown · Smith v. Ayer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] party may not prevail on a Rule 60(b)(3) motion ... where [it] has access to disputed information or has knowledge of inaccuracies in an opponent's representations at the time of the alleged misconduct.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Even where misrepresentations are made during a litigation, it is not an abuse of discretion to deny relief to the losing party under Rule 60(b)(3), where the party had access to accurate information.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he treatment of a Rule 60(b) motion is committed to the discretion of the district court and may be reversed only upon a finding of an abuse of that discretion.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.