Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

853 F.2d 927

Docket No. 88-5653.

White v. White

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1988-08-05

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently August 1988 · most notably Mayle v. Ohio Power Company (1988), Mario Mlinaric v. Parker Hannifin Corporation (1988)

25 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Ambrose v. Welch · Trufant v. Autocon, Inc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1988-08-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

Before LIVELY, MERRITT and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

¶1

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

¶2

A review of the record indicates that the magistrate entered an order on May 9, 1988, allowing the petitioner to respond within 20 days to the motion to dismiss his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed by the respondents on April 20, 1988. The petitioner appealed from that order on May 23, 1988.

¶3

An order of the magistrate is not appealable unless the magistrate is given plenary jurisdiction by the district court and by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(1). Ambrose v. Welch, 729 F.2d 1084 (6th Cir.1984) (per curiam); Trufant v. Autocon, Inc., 729 F.2d 308 (5th Cir.1984). The magistrate was not given plenary jurisdiction in this case. The order was filed as provided by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(b)(1).

¶4

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

/853/f2d/927 · .json · Public domain