Arnold v. Villarreal’s Empirical Analysis
853 F.3d 384 · 2017
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on 10 Cal. 4th 1226 - Alliance Mortgage Co. v. Rothwell · 49 Cal. 2d 210 - Spellens v. Spellens · Conroy v. Regents of University of California · 183 Cal. App. 3d 194 - Cicone v. URS Corp. · Sterk v. Redbox Automated Retail, LLC
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(Emphasis added.) That the Brotherhood seeks to relitigate this point on appeal betrays ignorance either of the Board's decision or of the governing law. Again, the Board's interpretation of the contract is conclusive even if we think it wrong or unpersuasive. D. Rule 38 Sanctions Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure authorizes us to sanction an appellant for filing a frivolous appeal. An appeal is frivolous”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“when the result is obvious or when the appellant's argument is wholly without merit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“submit an affidavit and supporting papers specifying the damages”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Matter Of Lisse
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.