Ricchio v. McLean’s Empirical Analysis
853 F.3d 553 · 2017
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1589 (§ 112 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000) · 18 U.S.C. § 1595 · 22 U.S.C. § 7102 (§ 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tambone · García-Catalán v. United States · Decotiis v. Whittemore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“benefits, financially or by receiving anything of value, from participation in a venture which has engaged in”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]n isolation this may be so, but the complaint is to be read as a whole, and we read the statement in light of the allegations of the Patels' complaisance in response to the several alleged exhibitions of McLean's coercive and brutal behavior to a physically deteriorating Ricchio.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bistline v. Parker“[gave] attention to the whole body of allegations as circumstantially supplying meaning to particular acts by the Patels that the trial judge found too ambiguous to support the claims when considered in isolation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bistline v. Parker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.