Benham v. Driegert’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Celebrezze · Bullock v. Carter · Burdick v. Takushi · Clements v. Fashing · Libertarian Party of Texas v. Fainter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Election laws will invariably impose some burden upon individual voters. Each provision of a code, whether it governs the registration and qualifications of voters, the selection and eligibility of candidates, or the voting process itself, inevitably affects — at least to some degree — the individual’s right to vote and his right to associate with others for political ends.... Consequently, to subject every voting regulation to strict scrutiny and to require that the regulation be narrowly tailored to advance a compelling state interest ... would tie the hands of States seeking to assure that elections are operated equitably and efficiently.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hodges
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.