De Luna v. Hidalgo County’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“risks that defendants who do not think to 'speak up' during arraignment about their inability to pay fines may be jailed solely by reason of their indigency, which the Constitution clearly prohibits”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Humphrey“the absence of any inquiry into a defendant's indigency unless the defendant 'raises' it of his or her own accord does not provide the process due”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Humphrey
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.