Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 853 N.E.2d 970 - Pope v. State

Pope v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Morrissey v. Brewer · Parker v. State · McCorker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) written notice of the claimed violations of probation; (b) disclosure to the probationer of the evidence against him; (c) opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a neutral and detached hearing body; and (f) a written statement by the fact finders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]hen the State seeks to revoke a defendant's placement in a Community Corrections Program, the defendant is 'not entitled to the full due process rights afforded a defendant in a criminal proceeding.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.