Springer v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
September 2012
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Loosley · Mollerup v. Storage Systems International · Tech-Fluid Services, Inc. v. Gavilan Operating, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Therefore, if a debtor, acting in good faith, has substantially complied with the procedural requirements of the rule in such a manner that the [lien holder] is not injured or adversely affected, and is getting what he is entitled to, the law will not aid in depriving the [debtor] of his property for mere falling short of exact compliance with technicalities.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Grazer v. Jones“has allowed substantial compliance with the requirements of rule 69(f)(2), which prescribes the process by which redemption is made, but not with rule 69()(@[, which establishes the redemption period].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.