Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

853 So. 2d 1102

Sexton v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 27, 2003

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2003-08-27

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2017

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2003-08-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Larry Sexton timely appeals from his June 28, 2002 resentencing, which effectively denied his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. Sexton expressly waived all postconviction challenges in court and on the record before his last sentencing. This overcomes all of Sexton’s claims, including his argument that the trial court erred in relying on an allegedly incomplete transcript of his 1997 sentencing to determine the basis of his original plea agreement.

¶2AFFIRMED.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/853/so2d/1102 · .json · Public domain