Granger v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 437 So. 2d 19 - Box v. State · 484 So. 2d 1002 - Gates v. State · 495 So. 2d 464 - Coates v. State · 460 So. 2d 828 - Harris v. Buxton TV, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The prosecution meets this burden by presenting testimony from an officer or other person having knowledge of the facts, who states that the confession was made voluntarily without threats, coercion, or offer of reward.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“of a nature calculated under the circumstances to induce a confession irrespective of its truth or falsity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“when a party seeks to offer evidence which in turn is excluded by the trial court, before a reviewing court will consider the matter on appeal the party must have somehow placed in the record the nature and substance of the proffered evidence for our consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.