Brockway v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1993
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1999
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Royster v. State · Mayes v. State · Bird v. State · Dowden v. State · Gonzales v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A two-pronged test is used to determine whether a charge on a lesser included offense is required. First, the lesser included offense must be included within the proof necessary to establish the offense charged. Second, there must be some evidence in the record that if the defendant is guilty, he is guilty only of the lesser offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McElhaney v. State“[i]f the evidence admitted at trial could be interpreted to show that appellant committed robbery but did not use a knife, then appellant would have been entitled to a charge on the lesser offense of robbery. We, however, do not read the victim’s testimony as evidence that appellant, if guilty, is guilty only of the lesser offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McElhaney v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.