Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 853 SW2D 40 - Curry v. Wilson

Curry v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
3
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently November 2013 · most notably Kerry Heckman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Williamson County (2012), State v. Blank (1997)

35 state decisions

140199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Willy v. Coastal Corp. · Fuller v. Oregon · Cleveland v. Ward · Boykin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... Disputes which arise over the enforcement of statutes governed by the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, and which arise as a result of or incident to a criminal prosecution .... [7]”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State Ex Rel. Holmes v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Third District · State v. John D. Shelton
  2. “Our decision holds that a trial court has not lost jurisdiction over a criminal law matter until all of the issues ... attendant to that criminal law matter are resolved.” Curry, 853 S.W.2d at 45 n. 3. 12 .Article 103.001 states that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Armstrong v. State
  3. “Undoubtedly, the enforcement of an order issued pursuant to a criminal statute is a criminal law matter as much as the issuance of the order itself, even if it requires this Court to examine civil laws in the process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. Johnson v. TENTH JUD. DIST. CT OF APPEALS

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.